The Portland Metro Photographic News

Photography News,
Commentary and Events
from the Pacific Northwest

Photo News Blog

When Is A Photograph Fine Art? by Andrew Coppin

Posted by Hub on July 22, 2009 at 1:26 AM

Editor's Notes: PMPN's discussion of "When Is A Photograph Fine Art?" continues with the thoughts of the owner of an on-line photography gallery, Andrew Coppin.  His Gallery represents the work of many categories of photographers, including Fine Art.  Andrew's thoughts regarding photography provide insights into the commercial and aesthetic considerations that a gallery uses to ultimately designate an image as fine art.


About Andrew Coppin:  Andrew is the founding Director of Ph.Art Gallery and is involved at all levels of its day-to-day operation and development. He has an array of experience in the financial markets, management and business development. Whilst establishing and running numerous successful small business operations in the past, he spent over 15 years working as a financial Adviser and in Executive Management teams in some of Australia's leading financial services firms (Merrill Lynch, Bell Potter, Patersons). His management experience in small and large enterprises in the Maritime, Hospitality, Finance and Technology sectors covers areas as diverse as start-up, business strategy and development, marketing, analysis and operations.


Following his passion for Photography led Andrew to the formation of the Gallery concept over 5 years ago, and its ultimate commercial launch in 2008. Andrew is a keen Amateur Photographer and a member of the AIPP (Australian Institute of Professional Photography).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




As founder and owner of the online gallery www.photoartgallery.com, I have the privilege to wake every morning knowing that a plethora of new images awaits our gallery from some 7,000 photographers around the world. The quality of the images generated by the skilful eyes of our many members never ceases to amaze me, our daily dose of insights and enlightenment from across the globe.

 

Our gallery curation team of professional and semi-professional photographers uses our on-line rating and curation systems to assess every image that is requested for submission into either our Public Gallery, or the more exclusive Collectors Gallery housing our limited edition (1/20) images, which we ultimately market, manage and sell for our members.


Photography forums are constantly abuzz with reports of new sales, the latest equipment or discussions on some technical specification.  But when someone posts the question: "So what is Fine Art?", it is met with a deafening silence until, like a tumbleweed, it gathers responses and provokes days of forum entries that roar out across the network!


So when does a Photograph become Fine Art?   I believe the answer to this question depends entirely upon your perspective and the position from which you assess it, and I further believe that few of the arguments put forward are wrong.  Photographer, viewer, collector or critic...everyone may answer the question from a different perspective and, individually or collectively, they could all be right. Herein lie the contention and conjecture of this subject, one which has been debated over the centuries and concerns more than just the medium of Photography


And so....to address the issue from a Gallery Owner's perspective is probably the best I can offer you, as, at the end of the day, we would argue that "Fine Art" most likely needs to have a marketable value to parties other than the artist.  Challenged with the task of marketing and promoting emerging Photographic Artists whilst never dismissing the artistic, emotive and more technical aspects of the work, we also need to be mindful of images that could interest a wider audience, and the potential of financial value to both the artist and prospective buyers.


Using a well-documented Curation process which all members of our team are compelled to learn, study and be assessed on, the team begin their days initially assessing the many images from a quality, resolution and composition perspective. Sifting through hundreds of images a day and sorting these images on criteria of over 15 points of merit is a considerable and sometimes arduous task...and yet still one that doesn't necessarily define the work as Fine Art.


For us, Fine Art remains in the eye of the beholder, in the engagement of the viewing audience and in the reference of any work against its peers.


  • Can it "hang" in our Gallery?
  • Could it take pride of place in a physical Gallery amongst peers and be respected for its integrity and emotive response?
  • Does the image have merit at an emotional and engaging level beyond the eye of the photographer?

In assessing photographic imagery as Fine Art, these are the sort of questions we find ourselves asking, well after the technical merit, resolution and finish of the image are clarified.  From my perspective, these are the considerations that we need to take into account.


We take great pleasure promoting great imagery in conjunction with our members, and presenting it to its best advantage with magnificent finishes, stocks and frames. The satisfaction of generating that next sale, of seeing a member's artwork hanging in its pride of place, is more than enough to compensate for that next big decision for our next work of Art, knowing that even then, we may not always get it "right".


- Andrew Coppin


Categories: Guest Commentaries

Post a Comment

Oops

  • Oops, you forgot something.
You must be a member to comment on this page. Sign In or Register

3 Comments

Reply styles
09:59 AM on July 22, 2009
to start....fine art photography should be printed and not viewed on a screen. Browsing your online gallery I was amazed at some of the creative work until I came across the pages and pages of HDR images. To me this is where photo art ends...there is nothing difficult about setting a tripod down and popping off say from 3-20 exposures and then letting the software blend the image for you. Using something like photomatix you can run the same image through and every time get different results...so much for pre visualizing the shot.
Reply Googlemonster
02:36 AM on July 23, 2009
styles, I couldn't disagree more.
As digital photographer, I wouldn't dream of dream of producing a print directly from a RAW image without some form of post-processing. Using a RAW processor, I am able to fine tune the colour-balance, contrast adaption, depth of shadows, highlight correction, etc. to match the scene as I choose to represent it. No matter how well exposed the original image is, a digital RAW image can always, and should always, be post-processed. I liken this process to developing a film negative. The negative is not the final result, and neither is the captured RAW information. The post-production techniques employed today are similar to, but far more extensive than the way we used to operate in the darkroom. Extending RAW post-processing to a number of digital exposures that cover a greater dynamic range than a digital sensor can handle in a single exposure, allows photographers the flexibility of better representing the dynamic range present in the scene. To me, HDR imagery is not about sitting the camera on a tripod and popping off shots to see what the software comes up with; it's about capturing the complete dynamic range of the scene.
The post-processing software, like the darkroom, should be used to tease out the right amount of dynamic range and tonal variation the composition demands to make the statement the photographer is trying to portray.
Sometimes this can be done in a single exposure, sometimes it may take more, but it is the subject, and the tonal variation of the light on the subject that determines that. It should never be be down to the camera hardware or software used to capture it. If the sensor cannot fully capture the dynamic range required to represent the scene, then obviously, a single exposure will never be sufficient. Any photographer that stands on principles that state one exposure is always enough is unnecessarily limiting themselves and the quality of their final image.
In my mind, HDR images should be no different to single exposures if they convey the tonal range and above all, represent the artistic vision the photographer has for the scene they are representing.
It is true that some HDR images are garish, overprocessed, and in some cases, downright nasty, but this is the fault of the user, not the process itself. I have seen many, many examples of dreadfully overprocessed single-exposures in Photoshop to know that there is no accounting for good taste. To summarily dismiss HDR images as "where photo art ends" is similar to decrying Photoshop as the deathknell of good taste.
Reply Christopher Perez
12:47 PM on July 23, 2009
First, regarding HDR - Restricting creative output to the limits of the basic tools is like avoiding paint brushes because a traditional "art form" requires a palette knife. Seriously: Tools are just tools. Only insiders care about the "how". Viewers tell us what is important to them by "voting with their money".

Second comment:
Arbiters of art tell us what is "fine" by the choices they make in who they allow to show in a gallery. The anarchy of the internet has had a very positive effect on the viewing and distribution of "fine art". People have the option of going straight to an artist, by-passing the arbiters.

Members Area

Upcoming Photographic Events

Exclusive Sponsor of PMPN's Masthead Photo Contest


Please Patronize Our Sponsors

Pro Photo Supply


(and the home of some real nice folks!)

Be All The Photographer You Can Be

Hand-Made In Oregon By Real Humans

HP Photo Processing Specials

SmugMug Your Pictures And Share Them With The World


Affordable Online Back Up for Invaluable Files

Protect your files with Carbonite Online Backup

As Seen On TV

Bring New Life To Your Family Memories

Photo Rectangle

Let ScanDigital convert your slides, negatives and movies to digital files. 

Keep family memories alive and ready for the next generation.

Maker of Professional-Worthy Bags & Backpacks


A Simple Way To Back Up Your Valuable Files


Hub's Beginning DSLR Classes


"Hub, you have quickly become an asset to my photography." - 2009 Student

"Wow Hub!  Amazing!" - 2009 Student

MagCloud: Monthly PMPN Photo Contest Sponsor


Looking for Something in PMPN? Search Here.

Buy All Your Photographic Books at Powell's Books - A Portland Institution

Visit Scenic Powells.com

Santa Fe Photographic Workshops


Hub's Free Educational Blogs for Beginning Digital Imagers


Hub's Camera
For those just getting started with the DSLR camera
Hub's iDarkroom

For those just starting in the digital imaging darkroom
Hub's Photography Tips
All those miscellaneous tips that make photography easier
Hub's Visionary Photographers
See the works and hear the words of today's prestigious photographers
Hub's Rising Stars of Photography
A public stage for the works and careers of today's emerging photographers

Become A Better Leader, Make Better Decisions, Achieve Better Results


Looking for PMPN Advertising Information?

CLICK HERE to download Portland Metro Photographic News advertising details.  Join our family of advertisers, spotlight your company and reap the rewards.


We DO NOT Spam Our Readers! JOIN TODAY!

NO SPAM from PMPN.  We will only send email information to you if you agree to become a member of the PMPN family.  It takes less than a minute.  It's free.  And it ensures that you will receive information that is important to you.

CLICK HERE to become a PMPN member!

Newest Members