The Portland Metro Photographic News

Photography News,
Commentary and Events
from the Pacific Northwest

Photo News Blog

The Third Golden Age of Photography

Posted by Hub on November 11, 2009 at 4:00 AM

A Guest Commentary by Robert Brummitt


Editor's note:  Robert Brummitt is a PMPN member and a familiar voice in Portland's photographic conversation.  Robert has a love affair with photography and works tirelessly with area youth to ensure that the photographic torch and passion is passed to the next generation.  We appreciate Robert sharing his thoughts with the PMPN community about the current state of photography.



Ok, I’m going to say this right off the bat. We are living in what could possibly be the Third Golden Age of Photography and the best of all times for photographers and fans of the medium. I believe we could be the luckiest generation of photographers since the dawn of photography!

 

The first golden age began when Mr. George Eastman created the Kodak Company with its slogan of “you press the button and we do the rest”.  Kodak was quickly followed by other photography manufacturers and materials. This entrepreneurial boom opened the realm of photography to the public to make it possible for anyone to explore their own their world with a camera.  It’s this product vision and the resulting movement that gave birth to expressive photography.

 

The second golden age was entered when the masters Stieglitz, Adams, Weston, Cunningham and others began to produce photographs that made the public stop, look and think. These creative leaders promoted and led the way. They demonstrated that photography was a true art form equal to painting sculpture and the like. Photographic galleries, museum collections, education systems and the commerce of photography soon followed.  The photo-news magazines such as Life, Look and others came on to the scene with photographers like Lange, Bourke-White, Smith and Capa who showed us the human experience and introduced previously closed societies to the countless varied cultures in our world.

 

So why do I believe we are living and working in the Third Golden Age of Photography?  Digital.

Digital photography and electronic venues have opened new doors and expanded our choices! We now have more photographic choices than ever before, and we should sample them all.

 

Digital Gives Us Choices

 

Today, we have the choice of working with an analog or digital camera, the choice of working in a darkroom or on a computer or a combination of the two.  Having these options affords us new tools of expression. This is not only a good thing. It’s a GREAT thing!  Just a decade ago, few of these choices existed. It’s all due to the advent of digital imaging and the waning influence of film-based photography. The result has been an explosion of creative photography and new voices in the photographic conversation.

 

Yes, there is the occasional backlash to digital photography because of the loss of materials, such as Kodakchrome and Polaroid films that we enjoyed and were integral to photography’s development. I know many who have said, “Digital photography is not ‘True’ photography.”  I quite disagree. But,that’s a topic for a later discussion.

 

I have also witnessed the resurgence of Alternative Processes. People are looking for other ways to create work without using a digital camera or a computer altogether. They have revived processes that have been absent for 100 years or more. The traditional black & white or color prints are making way for Platinum, Bromoils and Collodion-Gum-Platinumprints which give us, the viewers, even more to enjoy.

 

Digital has also given the novice a chance to experience photography and a new outlet for expressing themselves. I volunteer at a local high school photography class. As I stroll among the students, I often ask, “What camera are you using?” Cell phone was the most common answer. I thought yikes this was a whole new tool to try. So I started to “really” use my cell phone for some of my photography. I have to tell you that its been fun, and isn’t that why we’re all in it?

 

My cell phone has a 3.2 megapixel sensor. That’s more than my first digital point and shoot camera! The cell phone camera reduces photography to its most basic component – sight. No f/stops. No shutter speeds. No tripods. No flash. And no extras gadgets. It’s just the cell phone, my subject and me. Pure expression. Ruth Bernhard would say, “Today is the day to go out, photograph and create."  My cell phone is always with me, so I have followed Ruth’s advice with photographically pleasing results. Try it. 

 

There is another benefit we are experiencing since the rise of digital photography and the computer. We can immediately see and share our work. In days gone by, you had to print, mount, mat and frame your work for others to see what you were up to. If you were fortunate, you might be offered a show at a gallery or local café.

 

Today, we can still mount and display our work, but we can also use the Internet. We can join websites like this one! Many are free, and I would look for those first. Why pay a site to show work?  I belong to many photo-oriented websites. I share my work on some of these.  What I appreciate the most is the ability to view the work of others.  Work that, in the past, I would have never seen otherwise.  I can also share my thoughts of what is happening on the local photo scene. I have instant access to all sorts of sites that share images, biographies, discussions and a wealth of information – right at my fingertips. More importantly, I can network with hundreds of like-minded photographers. I have struck up conversations and discussions with people from around the globe. I can also share images with friends and family via e-mail as I’m sure you do as well.  The e-mail account has become the 21st century’s version of the “grandmother with wallet full of grandkids pictures!”

 

I continue to print, mount, mat and frame my best work. But for a great deal of my picture sharing, I find it much less expensive to make my selections, resize, reformat, attach photographs and send it to anyone on the world.  And, I get a lot more people seeing my work and providing feedback!

 

If you don’t wish to print your work one print at a time, consider doing a collection. There are several companies that afford photographers the tools necessary to create and self-publish their own books --online. With companies like Blurb or Lulu you can design your own coffee tablebook or publish a series. It will still cost you, but probably not as much as a photo exhibit.  It’s certainly easier today to create and share a book of your art than say a portfolio of 16x20 prints.

 

Yes, I believe we are living in a great time for photographers and for the craft.  When could you ever before pursued your own interests, choose to work in one or more fields, and produce photographic art with greater ease. It so much easier to take amazing images, to share our work and to view the accomplishments of others that we must be entering a new age of photography -- the Third Golden Age of Photography.

 

So, let’s look to the future, and where it will lead us. What do you think? If you are reading this then maybe I’m singing to the choir. Tell me if you agree or not. I’d like to hear your thoughts.

 

Categories: Guest Commentaries

Post a Comment

Oops

  • Oops, you forgot something.
You must be a member to comment on this page. Sign In or Register

14 Comments

Reply Michael Stathatos
10:52 AM on November 12, 2009
I agree, Robert, this is a great time to be a photographer. Thanks to all of the hype surrounding digital photography, I can pick up exceptionally fine, used film equipment for a song. Thanks you guys!
Reply Robert Brummitt
09:40 PM on November 12, 2009
Thanks Michael! As a matter of fact I'm helping a group I work with sell some of their Nikon gear. All bodies no lenses. I wouldn't get into too much a hurry buying gear just yet. As I said I volunteer at a local high school and there are students there very much interested film.
I had two other photographers share their work to the class. One does pin hole photography and the kids were chatting how much fun that looks. I plan to be there again. Maybe you would like to come and show your cyanotypes?
Reply Peter Gomena
11:24 AM on November 16, 2009
I couldn't agree more, Robert. I lately have come to realize how much knowledge and effort goes into overcoming the shortcomings of film photography every time I make a photograph. Digital photography not only has made imagemaking more accessible to everyone, but the potential to make more high-quality images has increased. And, once the shot is in the computer, the possibilities are limitless. Who could ask for more?
Reply Robert Brummitt
06:56 PM on November 16, 2009
And, once the shot is in the computer,
[/Peter Gomena]

Uhhh, shots in a computer? Not a good thing I would think :-)
Thanks Pete!
Reply Michael Stathatos
12:47 PM on November 17, 2009
Robert, why do you think that students are still interested in film photography? Could it be the enormous costs associated with digital photography? I think you are right that this is a "golden age" of photography, and those with the gold get to participate.

Pete Gomena do you hear what you have written? "I lately have come to realize how much knowledge and effort goes into overcoming the shortcomings of film photography every time I make a photograph."

The KNOWLEDGE and EFFORT!? SHORTCOMINGS of film photography!? What is wrong with knowledge and expending some effort to create a work of art? Seriously, I once heard a prominent "art " photographer state that with his digital work flow, he can simply set up his computer and printer, push a button, and then go off and play tennis. What a great craftsman! (of course I mean to say SLACKER!!). This is the same guy who couldn't be bothered with framing his work when it showed in an important gallery in Portland. Instead, he hung up the bare prints with the use of magnets. (Need I say more?)

"Digital photography not only has made imagemaking more accessible to everyone, but the potential to make more high-quality images has increased."

Again, your perspective as to whom this technology is accessible is confined only to those WHO CAN AFFORD IT! Digital photography is NOT a democratic art form. Again, I hate to be the purveyor of inconvenient truths, but someone has to do it.
Reply hubsportland
01:00 PM on November 17, 2009
Hi Michael,

I hear the "enormous" cost of digital expressed in many forums in many ways. I have a feeling that this is true for anyone already outfitted with a wet darkroom. But when starting from scratch and considering the ongoing cost of maintaining a digital or traditional photography environment, I'm not sure the cost difference is that great. But I have no solid data or research to back up my "gut" feeling.

But you've certainly given me food for thought and research -- as well as a potential topic for another PMPN article -- "Which cost more today -- film or digital?" Should be an interesting investigation.

Thank you.
Tom
Reply Peter Gomena
01:31 PM on November 17, 2009
Michael Stathatos says...
Robert, why do you think that students are still interested in film photography? Could it be the enormous costs associated with digital photography? I think you are right that this is a "golden age" of photography, and those with the gold get to participate.

Pete Gomena do you hear what you have written? "I lately have come to realize how much knowledge and effort goes into overcoming the shortcomings of film photography every time I make a photograph."

The KNOWLEDGE and EFFORT!? SHORTCOMINGS of film photography!? What is wrong with knowledge and expending some effort to create a work of art? Seriously, I once heard a prominent "art " photographer state that with his digital work flow, he can simply set up his computer and printer, push a button, and then go off and play tennis. What a great craftsman! (of course I mean to say SLACKER!!). This is the same guy who couldn't be bothered with framing his work when it showed in an important gallery in Portland. Instead, he hung up the bare prints with the use of magnets. (Need I say more?)

"Digital photography not only has made imagemaking more accessible to everyone, but the potential to make more high-quality images has increased."

Again, your perspective as to whom this technology is accessible is confined only to those WHO CAN AFFORD IT! Digital photography is NOT a democratic art form. Again, I hate to be the purveyor of inconvenient truths, but someone has to do it.
Reply Peter Gomena
01:40 PM on November 17, 2009
Michael, by the shortcomings of film, I mean that a great deal of effort and skill has to be put into making a really good print. Not that I'm unwilling to do that, but take for instance making a traditional color print from a transparency on Cibachrome. Just to make the materials work together, you had to make a contrast control mask (usually after a couple of tries), put it in register and start printing. Your average person just ain't gonna get there from here.

Take a recent experience I had making a color panorama from 6 4x5" negatives. Even though the film was processed by a lab, making a flawless panorama was tough because of small variations in color and density from neg to neg. Digital capture would have given me much more consistent images to stitch.

With digital, every properly exposed image is perfect. No lab to screw things up, fewer vexing variations in color and density. Does that mean I'll abandon film tomorrow? No. I like film and have invested a lot of time and effort to learn the medium. If someone offered me a Canon 5D tomorrow, would I take it? You bet.

Pete Gomena
Reply Robert Brummitt
06:32 PM on November 17, 2009
[Michael Stathatos]
Robert, why do you think that students are still interested in film photography? Could it be the enormous costs associated with digital photography? I think you are right that this is a "golden age" of photography, and those with the gold get to participate.

Pete Gomena do you hear what you have written? "I lately have come to realize how much knowledge and effort goes into overcoming the shortcomings of film photography every time I make a photograph."

Hey Michael.
Students are interested in film. Most are working with 35mm. They have a choice to either scan the film or work in the darkroom. I would have to ask the instructor I work with but I would say most students scan. But I could be wrong.
I base my information on seeing the students at computers verse those walking into the darkroom.
What I also found is that when I introduced the two medium format cameras to them and explained that the equal size digital camera costs over $40.000. They understand the benefit of larger films and are willing to play with the two cameras.
I'm not going to debate the cost of one over another. Analog verse Digital There is no debate. Its boils down to choice. I like both and work with both. I know you like analog and that's fine with me. I like your work and I hope you can appreciate mine. They are both ways to visual expression.
This is great. Keep the posts flying boys!
Reply J Swofford
11:15 PM on November 17, 2009
In a general sense I agree with you, Mr. Brummitt, that we are in a golden age of photo. I don't think the reason, however, is solely the existence of digital photo. The reason is that digital has advanced to a degree of quality to match, and supplant, film. It simply doesn't matter which one a person uses anymore. I still use Tri-x in my 4x5, but I no longer scoff at people convinced that digital was "the way." Black and white film, color film, cross processed slides, digital photo, pinhole cameras, toy cameras, and others I can't think of off the top of my head are on an equal plane these days and the users of each making images in their own way. Photography is now free from the arguments of my way is better than your way and can truly become the poetry that it is.
Reply Robert Brummitt
02:32 AM on November 18, 2009
J Swofford says...
In a general sense I agree with you, Mr. Brummitt, that we are in a golden age of photo. I don't think the reason, however, is solely the existence of digital photo. The reason is that digital has advanced to a degree of quality to match, and supplant, film. It simply doesn't matter which one a person uses anymore. I still use Tri-x in my 4x5, but I no longer scoff at people convinced that digital was "the way." Black and white film, color film, cross processed slides, digital photo, pinhole cameras, toy cameras, and others I can't think of off the top of my head are on an equal plane these days and the users of each making images in their own way. Photography is now free from the arguments of my way is better than your way and can truly become the poetry that it is.


I agree with you.
We are freer to approach photography in so many wonderful ways. To share ideas and thoughts much more easier then before. I guess the word Digital was the wrong one for some. It brings out such animosity.
How would you term it, then? Electronic? What I wrote was to say we are in a great time. A golden age of us. Not seen before in past generations. We can share images around the globe with ease. We can print images to share in person as well. The digital camera has open the door for some and offered new venues for others.
I see it giving people choices. You choose Tri-X in large format. Great! Good for you. I use Fuji film in medium format but I also use my digital camera at times and I always carry my cell phone. These are my choices.
This is a fun time and I look forward to see more.
Thank you!
Reply Michael Stathatos
11:07 AM on November 18, 2009
I can see that I'm alone here, I guess that's what I get for goring the sacred ox. What I'm saying is that not everyone has a choice between photography and digitography. Economics decides that question. The main point that I'm trying to make is that it takes a great deal of effort to make digital photographs. For instance, how much effort does it take to earn the $40,000.00 that a digital Hasselblad costs? For those who are independently wealthy, there is no question (and no debate). I really don't believe that the posters here are in that category though, but I could also be wrong about that.

I'm happy that everyone here is enthralled with the new technology and are able to take advantage of it, but for everything that is gained, something is lost. With the rush to embrace this technology, thanks to the realities of the marketplace, we are losing the very fine quality film and paper products which we have used and depended upon lo these many years. As far as I can see it, we are not getting more choices, we are being forced to accept the remnants of what is left over.
Reply Peter Gomena
02:33 PM on November 18, 2009
Gee, Michael, I missed the golden age of glass plates by about 60 years. Today, I don't think I could afford to keep the pack horse I'd need to carry 50 sheets of glass into the field.

I won't argue the expense of digital versus film. I can't afford the computer, printer and scanner I'd really like to have. When I first started printing digital files, I was shocked at the price of paper and ink. I expected it to be cheaper than traditional photographic paper. I'm now using Photoshop CS3. I started out with Photoshop 5, which was about $600. At $135/upgrade, I've shelled out more than $1,000 just for the software. Add another $400 for scanning software upgrades. I'm on my second computer and it's 4 years old. My monitor is a CRT that has a finite lifespan.

It used to be that if you bought a good enlarger, camera, lenses, you were set for years. My Canon F1 and lenses were made in 1980 and function perfectly today. My Hasselblad will last me the rest of my photographic life. If I put the equivalent investment into digital gear, it will be obsolete in 5 years. Tell me I can even find the proprietary batteries in 10 years for the digital camera I buy today. (Oh, and about those mercury cells for the Canon F1 . . . can't find those, either.)

Photography has never been cheap. I wish my private investment in gear over the years would come close to paying for itself. I certainly can't sell it for what it's worth in continued utility. You have to pay to play, and the price of admission is high. Problem is, you have to keep on paying.

Pete Gomena
Reply J Swofford
02:36 PM on November 18, 2009
Michael Stathatos says...
I can see that I'm alone here, I guess that's what I get for goring the sacred ox. What I'm saying is that not everyone has a choice between photography and digitography. Economics decides that question. The main point that I'm trying to make is that it takes a great deal of effort to make digital photographs. For instance, how much effort does it take to earn the $40,000.00 that a digital Hasselblad costs? For those who are independently wealthy, there is no question (and no debate). I really don't believe that the posters here are in that category though, but I could also be wrong about that.

I'm happy that everyone here is enthralled with the new technology and are able to take advantage of it, but for everything that is gained, something is lost. With the rush to embrace this technology, thanks to the realities of the marketplace, we are losing the very fine quality film and paper products which we have used and depended upon lo these many years. As far as I can see it, we are not getting more choices, we are being forced to accept the remnants of what is left over.



No, you're not alone. I was, and still am to some extent, an anti-digital photo hold out. In a couple of hours I'll be dipping and dunking sheet film in my darkroom. What I am trying to say is that photographs produced using digital cameras, computers, and inkjet printers in some cases are indistinguishable from photographs produced using C-41 film and RA-4 paper. This is a good thing for Photo in general because it makes the argument somewhat moot. My point is that there is no single process in photography that has supremacy. The entire history of Photo is still important and relevant. And while I literally wept when Polaroid died, I firmly believe that silver based photo will not die. I personally refuse to let it. Silver based photo and digital based photo are brothers now on equal footing.

Members Area

Upcoming Photographic Events

Exclusive Sponsor of PMPN's Masthead Photo Contest


Please Patronize Our Sponsors

Pro Photo Supply


(and the home of some real nice folks!)

Be All The Photographer You Can Be

Hand-Made In Oregon By Real Humans

HP Photo Processing Specials

SmugMug Your Pictures And Share Them With The World


Affordable Online Back Up for Invaluable Files

Protect your files with Carbonite Online Backup

As Seen On TV

Bring New Life To Your Family Memories

Photo Rectangle

Let ScanDigital convert your slides, negatives and movies to digital files. 

Keep family memories alive and ready for the next generation.

Maker of Professional-Worthy Bags & Backpacks


A Simple Way To Back Up Your Valuable Files


Hub's Beginning DSLR Classes


"Hub, you have quickly become an asset to my photography." - 2009 Student

"Wow Hub!  Amazing!" - 2009 Student

MagCloud: Monthly PMPN Photo Contest Sponsor


Looking for Something in PMPN? Search Here.

Buy All Your Photographic Books at Powell's Books - A Portland Institution

Visit Scenic Powells.com

Santa Fe Photographic Workshops


Hub's Free Educational Blogs for Beginning Digital Imagers


Hub's Camera
For those just getting started with the DSLR camera
Hub's iDarkroom

For those just starting in the digital imaging darkroom
Hub's Photography Tips
All those miscellaneous tips that make photography easier
Hub's Visionary Photographers
See the works and hear the words of today's prestigious photographers
Hub's Rising Stars of Photography
A public stage for the works and careers of today's emerging photographers

Become A Better Leader, Make Better Decisions, Achieve Better Results


Looking for PMPN Advertising Information?

CLICK HERE to download Portland Metro Photographic News advertising details.  Join our family of advertisers, spotlight your company and reap the rewards.


We DO NOT Spam Our Readers! JOIN TODAY!

NO SPAM from PMPN.  We will only send email information to you if you agree to become a member of the PMPN family.  It takes less than a minute.  It's free.  And it ensures that you will receive information that is important to you.

CLICK HERE to become a PMPN member!

Newest Members